It’s a m-m-m-monster!

It’s a m-m-m-monster!

So apparently, this is what I do on my day off – search the internet for useless information. In my travels today I came across some news articles about monster myths, specifically sea monsters. Generally speaking I’m not a “monster” girl, I like to think about nice things. But as I was reading through I was struck by the way that these writers are minimizing things and creatures that are really spectacular.

In this article we find that just last month a huge sea creature washed up on shore down in South Carolina. I mean, it’s huge! But don’t worry, it’s not a monster because scientists have identified it as the known fish species sturgeon. That makes me feel better about swimming in the ocean with a species of fish that can grow 10-15 feet long and weigh upwards of 300-800 lbs. just on average. There are even reports of weighing more than 4,000 lbs.

sturgeon

I guess what tweaked me a little was that the article then went on to talk about other sea creature sightings and how they can all be explained away. For example: “Other normal fish besides the sturgeon have been mistaken for monsters, including oarfish and gar.” I would like to put the question forth, what is our definition of “normal” and what can we safely call a “monster”?

This oarfish they speak of…

89610031-oarfish

…will on average grow to over 35 feet and the longest one on record was over 55 feet. That’s feet, not inches. Feet. Don’t lie, if one of these puppies brushed up against your leg in the ocean, you would never go near the beach again. Never. That’s what I call a monster.

The last fish that the article mentioned was the gar…

alligator gar fish main 2

…which are known to grow over 10 feet long and weigh over 300 lbs. But the most notable feature of this little fishy are it’s rows of very very sharp teeth.

A notable mention…

catfish1

…a “giant catfish”. In my opinion, anything with the term “giant” in it’s official name qualifies as monster material.

So I guess this is the point I’m trying to make here: is the simple fact that we as human have named and categorized something mean that it is no longer monstrous? It’s the thought that if we’ve seen it before and can rationally explain it’s existence we are once again superior. My definition of a monster: anything that can eat me.

Don’t get me wrong, I believe that there are many wonderful uses for science and it’s ability to help us understand the wonder of the world we live in, but one of the sad bi-products of some science is the minimizing of God’s amazing creative abilities and the maximizing of our limited human intellect. We know we’re in trouble when our first response is, “Oh that? It’s just a…”

I think it’s a good thing to believe in monsters, because the simple fact that we have scientific names for these massive creatures does little to take away from their monstrosity, at least in my book.

<><
MAC

Ps. A little parting treat for you… But don’t worry, it’s just a giant stingray.

giant-stingray-bluesheet_547_600x450

 

More from my site

  • Tips from an experienced hurricane survivorTips from an experienced hurricane survivor I want a badge or at least a pin that says, "I survived Irene". It would be even better if I were a guy married to a girl named Irene, but that of course is a purely hypothetical […]
  • Seeing with your eyes closedSeeing with your eyes closed Our brains are brilliant things. Our bodies - fearfully and wonderfully made. But, from time to time our brains and our bodies go on the fritz. In these instances our brains blur the lines […]
  • You killed our love fern!You killed our love fern! Every spring I get the itch to garden. I start thinking of all the lovely organic vegetables I could grow for "free". I go online and look up information on gardening in New England. I see […]
  • Box and anti-box people.Box and anti-box people. Last night I had a board meeting for work. Don't worry though, it isn't as ominous as it sounds, honestly, my board members are a delight to work with. At some point during the meeting, […]
  • Why I love today.Why I love today. First off, what's not to love? It's Friday. It's BEAUTIFUL out! I wore open toed shoes. Tonight Missy is coming over and I am introducing her to LOTR (it is an atrocity that she has gone […]
  • Awww it’s like spring…wait, it still is springAwww it’s like spring…wait, it still is spring I love watching (what seem to be healthy) relationships budding all around me. There are a few potential couples I've been keeping my eye on, and I've been rewarded by seeing their […]
  • Lions and Tigers and Bears…sort of.Lions and Tigers and Bears…sort of. I am continually surprised by the wild life here in Connecticut. I once laughed so hard when my Grandmother (a.k.a. G-Strik)  suggested that there were lions in the woods near our house. […]

Trackbacks and pingbacks

No trackback or pingback available for this article.

2 comments

  1. Holy snot. I'm not sure if I can ever swim in the ocean again.
    Nevertheless, you have an awesome point. I've always thought the same thing, especially with things like "bigfoot" (a current obsession of my little brother) and other urban legends. If we found and classified one of them the mystery would be gone, but the creature would still be just as terrifying to meet in the wild.
    A rose (or monster) by any other name...;)

    Reply
    1. I know, right! I totally agree with you!

      Reply

Leave a reply